How to read this Case of Study

This specific person that I have come across in the past months (the contacts started over Twitter at the beginning of February 2010, and ended abruptely out of my choice to cut the fake person out on April 18th, 2010) is a perfect exemple on how stalkers and potentially damaging people are surrounding us in the web.

 

They look unharming, mostly acting kind, even shy in their communications around.

 

They really seem so normal that it's easy to fall for them and not easily realize their mental compulsions, unless something happens that make us see all the links coming together, and getting a very different and deeper evaluation.

 

I chose to present this specific case because it helps me pointing out exactly what I want to portray: stalkers are here, ready to hurt and damage out of their impossibility of dealing with a normal life, and the web allows them a whole army of resources and cover ups that need to be addressed and explained, and possibly fought against.

 

Of course since this person is an alive an operating person, this site will use a series of privacy escamotages to avoid legal issues (see the appropriate section of this site about it). I will use the "Blind Coverage" referring to this particular story but I will create a way to obtain the evidences this stalker's behaviours, given only after written request by recognizeable people, and a legal disclaimer related to them, in the way I would do if I would just send to my friends asking materials detained in complete legal form by me that details this particular stalker actions, to protect them from bad experiences related to exactly those pattern actions that are part of a stalker's profile.

 

Hence, here you will see a series of "characters" that are ALL real persons, to guide you understanding what a stalker is and does, that seems so "normal", while instead it's pathological.

 

Since this peculiar stalker has as obsession a famous person (quite typical) is especially to protect this specific person, his entourage and family, that I have chosen to create "characters" out of real names. In the end, the course of the privacy choice is even more appropriate, because if I'd act differently, the stalker damages to those she claims to "like" or "love" would be already more effective.

 

I just want to point out HERE (then, please refer again yourself to the legal page for more) that NOTHING in this history is actually objectable of information stealing.

This because all that I will detail was FULLY AVAILABLE ON THE WEB AT THE TIME IT WAS WRITTEN, namely NO PRIVACY in fact could apply to anything I am about to share.

 

I state again that I won't OPENLY name Psycho identity here (but I will through that codified sharing under request I mentioned, providing undeniably evidences of her communications, to erase any doubt about her actions) not for protecting the stalker, but for protecting the people that stalker is fooling along the way all stalkers normally do.

 

Along the part properly related to the legal impact regarding this site and its policy, I will detail the concept of stalkering using medical resources and tidbits of useful scientific evaluation to provide to all readers a way to understand what digital "freedom" really hides under and how the thin balance between digital sociability and digital harassment can be easily and often overcrossed.

 

I will then help the readers in their "smart" use of the web by addressing how your true privacy online can be protected efficaciously.

 

I will share how I could decode that the stalker was creating lying mirroring identities so to suggest how you can similarly, in total easy way, protect your digital persona and therefore your real life persona from obsessive freaks that float and fill the web.

 

To understand and get the best from this site, I strongly suggest to you all to READ carefully every single section.

 

Your acknowledge and awareness will help you after you will finish your reading experience over these pages in a better way than you can guess.

 

Follow the trail.

The characters here

  • ZairaAmaterasu (namely myself: I can of course be me without being a character. It's my choice);
  • Psycho (namely the crazy stalker, who's a FEMALE american woman. PLEASE NOTICE that in the downloadable material her Twitter nickname slightly changed on March 4th, 2010, which results in different icons in the printed sheets referring to her communication ever after, until the "cut off" moment );
  • Psycho's Obsession (the object of Psycho's diseased "love": an american celebrity);
  • LoverHaterMirror (the significant other of Psycho's Obsession);
  • NaiveDreamer (member of the family of Psycho's Obsession);
  • Entourage#1, Entourage#2...; ...#n (the inner circle inmates of Psycho's Obsession);
  • Peripheral#1, Peripheral#2...; ...#n (people related with Psycho's Obsession by working purpose, or roles related to the status of celebrity Psycho Obsession represents);
  • OccasionalAdmirer#1...; #2...; ...#n (whomever gets any kind of attention from Psycho's Obsession, pushing her trying to bond along);
  • FakerPsycho#1; FakerPsycho#2...; ...#n (Psycho's fake identities, that she uses when she feels she can't act like herself, for various reasons that will be medically evaluated, and strategically explained.

 

From a colorful premise...

When I started to interact with Psycho I used to being the way I always am with all people over Internet.

I tend to be very empathic; my daily life is a pretty happy life and as person I am quite cheerful and I like to talk with foreign people a lot.

Over Internet I tend to care to way less elements than I do in real life.

I am always very sincere, and I have to confess that in real life I would never speak with people who don't look pleasant to my eyes (sorry, I'm sincere), and I would have no problems in stopping any conversation with whomever who would sound not educated enough, or whomever who would just prove himself/herself a plain idiot.

I'm picky.

And I am because I can be.

If I do sound arrogant I don't care: I am always completely sincere, and I give respect to people by never try to fake them.


I still be that picky ALSO over Internet, but there in general I don't care about look (it doesn't come to affect my eye, so I can overcome that by not takin it into factual consideration), and I just go for the way people write or express themselves.

I like bright people.

If they can't be very bright, at least I like kind people.

I like to perceive the differencies among people, and being in real life a scientist, I like to evaluate the social identities and the various approaches to life of those who are coming from a different background and values than mines.


I hate fakers.


I would ALWAYS take a true person even acting mean, in a higher rank than a FAKE person acting kind.

Because a true mean person is anyway better than a fake kind person, who in the end is a fake MEAN person (syllogism).

 

People who lie are people who are not ok.


At the start of my Psycho story, she was being all kind of polite.

Not very bright, but kind enough to not being ejected by me.

She worked her way to fool me in a way that I will detail because it's the USUAL way she acts, and it's a common stalker pattern.

When I started to get call ups by my people about the fact she was having two faces...

well... my evaluation of her started to change...

 

...To all grey pieces.

And the grey pieces started to compose so clearly that I just shifted away from her.

I didn't really considered her a stalker by the time I evaluated her as a faker.

It was enough for me to see she was faking stuff to cut her off from my internet visuals.

That caused her to disveil to me her real stalker essence, through a Fake Identity (the FakerPsycho#1) trying to "damage" me (in her crazy head, she may think a site has really a value in my life... like it would have all value in her own... its also a sign of obsessive unreal behaviour, n.d.r.).

From that sign of Stalkering Pattern, and thanx to my powerful resources, I decided to decode her as a stalker.

And from that moment, April 20th of 2010, I have used my resources and professionality to serve Psycho a bitter dose of reality.

 

You have to be aware that after my disgraceful encounting with my own stalker years ago, I have been obvious object of a tight surveillance by my family, friends and loved ones.

Being wealthy enough, I have access to all systems that protect all my internet "spaces".

One of my dearest people is a web genius.

He's the one who has helped me with this site and with all the procedures regarding the recording of Psycho activities directed at me.

Thanx to this person and his work, any communication that reaches my web spaces (mail, chats, sites, decoded pages) gets recorded, IP tracked and put in memory.

I will let you know how to protect yourself through IP tracking at the end of this site.

 

What you need to know now is that if Psycho wouldn't have disveiled her as a Stalker through that FakerPsycho id actions, I would have let this go.

 

And I would have been WRONG again, just like at the start of this site's pages I stated I was when I was playing down strange people obsessive with me on the web years ago.

 

I would have been wrong in letting Psycho being unaffected by the results and evidences of her psychosis, because that way I would have sent the message that those are "not that important to take notice of", while instead they are.

 

Stalkers are POTENTIALLY DAMAGING PEOPLE.

 

They gotta be isolated, taken, and healed.

 

Follow me, and see what a stalker is.

 

NOTE: THE SECTIONS OF THE HISTORY OF A STALKER ARE AVAILABLE ON YOUR TOP LEFT BANNER: GET UP AND CLICK STARTING WITH "ANTIFACT".